Richard Dawkins clock Envy? Richard Dawkins Calls Clock maker A Fraud (PHOTO) Posted by Chris Tyler | Sep 22, 2015 | Sci/Tech, US | 3 | Share this:TweetShare on TumblrEmail Related Share: Rate:
Look, for all you non-engineers: This kid is a hoax, he gutted a normal electronic clock, stuffed it in a case, and when questioned, he zipped his lips and became suspiscious. Mom and Dad are members of an activist organization. They used him.
Richard Dawkins, a fading 74-year old evolutionary biologist, that few people in the world have ever heard of, has taken a time-out to verbally beat up a 14-year old student that was trying to learn about circuit boards and how they work. Hawkins¿ evolutionary work is an insignificant frill on the evolutionary theory based on many true scientists¿ efforts and research. This person has little room to criticize a teen¿s efforts in learning. What a fool! This school¿s efforts to diminish the boy was a clear incident of racism. If they were so concerned about a bomb then why didn¿t the police call in a bomb squad. Why did they take the device in a squad car to the station with no care for their own safety. This was an anti-Muslim set-up from the beginning. Palin is not bright enough to figure this out.
I blame the original teacher to whom Ahmed first showed his clock. Didn’t this teacher listen to him (Ahmed must have told him/her that hey, Teacher, look at this cool CLOCK I made)? Then couldn’t the teacher have then just looked over the contraption to determine if it was indeed a clock and not a bomb? (Perhaps if needing help, asking Ahmed to please show him what part is which). The teacher for whom Ahmed made the clock for must have had enough knowledge to determine what it was, otherwise what was the point of Ahmed making it to show the teacher in the first place? I don’t fault the police officers, who RESPONDED to a call,from the school and had a duty to take the call seriously for the safety of thousand(s) of students and faculty at the school. If it was by chance some kind of bomb, the first blame would have gone to the police if something had happened (I.e. Why didn’t they take it seriously?). The police are not to blame in this, the teacher is to blame!